Saturday, November 3, 2007

Rescue Dawn Review


Rescue Dawn Review

Starring Christian Bale, Steve Zahn and Jeremy Davies
Directed by Werner Herzog
Running time: 126 mins
Release date: 22 November 2007

From legendary filmmaker Werner Herzog, comes the incredible true story of RESCUE DAWN, which is certain to join THE THIN RED LINE and FULL METAL JACKET as one of the best war movies of the modern era.

In 1997, Werner Herzog made the documentary LITTLE DIETER NEEDS TO FLY, which told the extraordinary story of a German-born American Navy pilot, Dieter Dengler, who crash-landed in Laos during the Vietnam War. He was imprisoned in a POW camp and brutally tortured. He then engineered an extraordinary escape with the other inmates, both American and Vietnamese.

Christian Bale plays Dengler in RESCUE DAWN. It is one of this accomplished actor’s most breathtaking performances. From all-American wisecracker to beaten-down victim, Bale inhabits his character with such a fierce and passionate intensity that one recalls the similarly riveting performances of Herzog’s muse, Klaus Kinski. More to the point, the film’s survivalist snarl, its intense anti-heroism and Herzog’s abiding love of freakish wise men echo the filmmaker’s earlier masterpieces, COBRA VERDE and FITZCARRALDO in particular.

Bale is matched step for step by a group of accomplished character actors, including the wonderful Steve Zahn and Jeremy Davies as fellow POWs who help Dengler hatch his plans. The camerawork is characteristically stunning and the script is equally propulsive.

This incredible story of survival is played beautifully and resolutely by Bale, while Herzog’s perspective gives the film sublimity that can only be achieved by a master director.

www.mgm.com/sites/rescuedawn

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Man of the Year Review


Man of the Year (Review)

Starring: Robin Williams, Laura Linney, Christopher Walken, Jeff Goldblum,
Director: Barry Levinson (Good Morning Vietnam)

From 1987’s wartime comedy Good Morning, Vietnam to 1997’s current-events satire Wag the Dog, Oscar®-winning director BARRY LEVINSON’S films have often drawn their humor from a rich comedy source....the political arena. He has examined our politicos’ decisions and deceptions...and helped guilty voters laugh as we share with our elected leaders the fall-out of some pretty bad choices.

Now in his new comedy, the writer-director asks us to ponder a ‘what-if’ scenario that doesn’t seem so far-fetched in 2006: what would happen if a computer voting error allowed one of the nation’s funniest men to become its president? On October 13, 2006, Oscar® winner ROBIN WILLIAMS reunites with the filmmaker to answer just that question.

As we rapidly approach November 7 and the mid-term elections, Levinson explores the convergence of U.S. politics and pop culture events of the past decade....savvy pro-wrestlers and muscle-bound action stars have moved into governors’ mansions while millions of Americans receive their nightly news from wisecracking talkshow hosts...not the stern newscasters of the past. In Man of the Year, he brings a cast....all of whom understand that this blurry division is not an alien concept for a media devouring country....to erase the fine line between entertainment and government.

Welcome to the story of one entertainer’s accidental rise to power. Universal Pictures and Morgan Creek invite you to meet your latest Man of the Year. With his razor-sharp wit and signature style, Williams plays acerbic performer Tom Dobbs, a guy who has made a career out of skewering politicians and speaking the mind of the exasperated nation on his talk show. He cracks jokes at a fractured system Man of the Year - Production Information 2 night after night....until he comes up with a really funny idea: why not run for president himself? After one flip comment too many, Dobbs ignites a grassroots movement that puts him on the presidential ballot. Hot on the campaign trail....with his manager/mentor, Jack Menken (CHRISTOPHER WALKEN, Click, Wedding Crashers), and wisecracking head writer, Eddie Langston (LEWIS BLACK, Accepted, television’s The Daily Show), in tow....he debates elected drones and asks what frustrated voters have so often pondered: "What has happened to leaders’ responsibility to the very citizens they serve?"

On election day, Dobbs stuns the unsuspecting world by winning the vote. A shocked country wakes up to find that they have a new leader of the free world....the nation’s favorite wiseguy.

But a scrupulous voting-software analyst, Eleanor Green (LAURA LINNEY, Love Actually, Kinsey), soon learns that a glitch in her company’s voter software gave Dobbs a victory that was never meant to be his. Her mission? Help Dobbs learn the truth before her Machiavellian employer hunts her down, destroys her credibility and buries the secret of the botched election forever.

Now pursued by both Eleanor and her company’s nefarious chief legal counsel, Alan Stewart (JEFF GOLDBLUM, The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou, Jurassic Park), Dobbs has a big decision to make as time ticks on his inaugural clock: should he go back behind the mike or stay in the Oval Office and keep shaking things up?

Joining the writer-director behind the scenes is a cast of creative talent. Music for the film is by GRAEME REVELL (Sin City), and costume designs are by DELPHINE WHITE (Bulletproof Monk). The music supervisor is ALLAN MASON (The Parent Trap); the production designer is STEFANIA CELLA (John Q). The comedy is edited by STEVEN WEISBERG (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban) with BLAIR DAILY (Rain Man). DICK POPE (The Illusionist) serves as director of photography and PAM DIXON MICKELSON (Exorcist: The Beginning) is the casting director. Man of the Year’s is produced by Morgan Creek’s JAMES G. ROBINSON (Two For the Money, upcoming The Good Shepherd) and DAVID ROBINSON (Two For the Money, Exorcist: The Beginning) and executive-produced by GUY MCELWAINE DAVID COATSWORTH and ROB FRIED.

Official Website: www.manoftheyearmovie.net

Review: Robin Williams is brilliant, what a wonderful and possible way to look at politics and how we view the world.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Fahrenheit 9/11 (Review)


Fahrenheit 9/11

Cast: Michael Moore
Director: Michael Moore
Writer: Michael Moore
Genre: Documentary
Rated: M graphic war footage, adult themes, medium level coarse language
Running Time: 116 Minutes

**Winner 'Palme D'or' Best Picture 2004 Cannes Film Festival**

The Temperature Where Freedom Burns!

Synopsis:
One of the most controversial and provocative films of the year, Fahrenheit 9/11 is Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore's searing examination of the Bush administration's actions in the wake of the tragic events of 9/11. With his characteristic humour and dogged commitment to uncovering the facts, Moore considers the presidency of George W. Bush and where it has led us. He looks at how - and why - Bush and his inner circle avoided pursuing the Saudi connection to 9/11, despite the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis and Saudi money had funded Al Qaeda.

Fahrenheit 9/11 shows us a nation kept in constant fear by FBI alerts and lulled into accepting a piece of legislation, the USA Patriot Act, that infringes on basic civil rights. It is in this atmosphere of confusion, suspicion and dread that the Bush Administration makes its headlong rush towards war in Iraq - and Fahrenheit 9/11 takes us inside that war to tell the stories we haven't heard, illustrating the awful human cost to U.S. soldiers and their families.

My Verdict:
'Fahrenheit 9/11' will and is already becoming one of 2004's must-see movies. Regardless of your previous opinion of the USA and it's involvement with questionable characters, this movie will offer some insights that may make you change your mind, or convince you that you've been right all along. Whatever the case, it is a captivating, moving, entertaining, and ultimately intriguing documentary on the George W. Bush administration, and some of the events that have taken place since September 11th, 2001, including the war on Iraq.

The movie is typical Michael Moore. It moves along so that it is never boring, containing a mix of the graphically shocking and the funny. Moore narrates the movie, including some very witty lines, but also adding some very biting dialogue that is intended to be provocative and outrageous. Tongue in cheek, Moore goes about his business, where no-one is spared: he shows George W. Bush's reaction on being told of the September 11th attack, he shows Britney Spears thoughts on the President, he shows the unemployment in his hometown of Flint, Michigan and these are but a few of the multitude and variety of images he uses to spread his message. A highlight is his attempt to lure Congressmen into signing their children up for the armed forces: "There's not that many congressmen that've got kids over there… In fact, only one… Maybe you guys should send your kids there first. What do you think about that idea?"

If you have never seen a Michael Moore movie, television program, or read one of his books, 'Fahrenheit 9/11' is the perfect opportunity to acquaint yourself with his work. Some have called his work blatant propaganda, and others a revelation; it's really your choice to decide. Michael has a way with words that can be described as witty, sarcastic and even cynical, yet always very entertaining, and his work in this film is powerful and thought provoking, and for that alone it makes this documentary well worth seeing.

Rating : A-

Christina Bruce

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Finding Nemo (Review)


Finding Nemo (Review)

Released: August 28 2003
Cast: Albert Brooks, Ellen de Generes, Geoffrey Rush, Alexander Gould, Willem Dafoe, Erica Beck
Director: Andrew Stanton
Genre: Family/Adventure/Comedy
Rated: G
Running Time: 100 Minutes

There are 3.7 trillion fish in the ocean*, they're looking for one.

Synopsis:
Nemo (voiced by Alexander Gould) is a colourful clown fish and the only surviving offspring of his overprotective dad, Marlin (Albert Brooks). Marlin's fears for his son's safety in the danger-filled deep are realised when Nemo goes missing. Curiosity about a boat he spots from below has him being scooped out of the water and ending up in the aquarium of a Sydney dentist (Bill Hunter) where he meets a friendly group of fellow internees, including Moorish Idol, Gill (Willem Dafoe), the battle-scarred leader.

Meanwhile, panic-stricken Marlin sets out to find his son and is joined by Dory (Ellen DeGeneres), a talkative, cheery blue tang who has the best intentions but, unfortunately, also has a short-term memory problem. It's not all smooth swimming for Marlin and Dory whose encounters include a trio of sharks with distinctly Aussie accents. But these are not your everyday man-eaters; Bruce (Barry Humphries) is a great white, Anchor (Eric Bana) is a hammerhead and Chum (Bruce Spence) is a mako and they are all members of Fish Eaters Anonymous who are trying their darndest not to eat the other underwater residents! Sometimes, unfortunately, they fall off the wagon. In one Pinocchio-like setback, the two would-be rescuers also end up inside a blue whale. Back in the dentist's office, escape plans are in progress for Nemo who has to get out before he is collected by the dentist's nasty niece whose evil reputation for murdering marine life precedes her. Outside help comes from a pelican named Nigel (Geoffrey Rush) - hey, if sharks can be veggies, a pelican can avoid temptation, too!

Added to the excitement, humour and the wonderfully conceived characters are some of the most beautiful backdrops you'll see in an animated feature, which truly comes into its own in the artists' dazzling depiction of the Great Barrier Reef. As entertainment for all members of the family, Finding Nemo is a real catch.


My Verdict:
Finding Nemo is a delightful movie about letting go and believing in yourself. Nemo is the dearest little fish who is fearless and ready to take on challenges. His father, Marlin, is very protective, almost to a point of excess, which frustrates Nemo. However, Nemo did not count on becoming an exhibit in a dentist's aquarium and the film centres around his desire to be with his father again, and of his father's search for him.

The animation is superb with lavish displays of colour so wonderfully used, particularly to depict the Great Barrier Reef. It is another triumph for the Pixar studios which have also given us the two Toy Story movies, A Bug's Life and Monsters, Inc. Finding Nemo is yet another feather in their caps as it doesn't fail to deliver at any level. There are a few moments which could be frightening to some very young viewers, but these are certainly dealt with quickly.

Finding Nemo is one of the must-see movies for 2003, and has the added bonus of being a family movie, making it accessible to all. It is a joy from start to finish and well worth parting cash for.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Superman Returning?


Superman Returning?

Sequel speculation surfaces.

By : Stax

August 14, 2006 - Warner Bros. is reportedly trying to seal a deal with Bryan Singer to direct a sequel to Superman Returns, but don't get too excited just yet over that news or by Singer's previous claim that the sequel could be ready by 2009.

At just under $200 million domestically, Superman Returns is considered an underperformer, although the film has yet to open in several international markets (although it hasn't done phenomenally abroad where it has opened). Bottom line: Superman's returns aren't strong enough to make a sequel a sure thing.

Nevertheless, industry speculation suggests that Warners has simply sunk too much money into the Man of Steel to ditch the franchise now, according to Variety.

If home entertainment and TV revenues are profitable then, Variety claims, "Warners and co-financing partner Legendary Pictures have a shot at breaking even on Superman once all the revenue streams are accounted for, but it's going to be a long, tough haul."

Although Warners denies it, the studio and Legendary are said to want any Superman sequel to come in at $200 million and below (Returns cost $225+ million).

"Negotiations between Singer and the studio would get delicate if Warners wants to include over-budget penalties," Variety reports. "Warners certainly can't wrest control away from a director like Singer, but it can try to make sure the budget stays under a certain level."

Given the development, production and marketing costs of Superman Returns, Warners and Legendary reportedly stand to lose over $20 million apiece.

But Superman's so-so performance aside, Warner Bros. still has had a crummy summer thanks to flops such as Poseidon and Lady in the Water.

Monday, July 2, 2007

HARRY POTTER and the PHILOSOPHER'S STONE (Review)


HARRY POTTER and the PHILOSOPHER'S STONE and the PHILOSOPHER'S STONE

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, John Cleese, Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Richard Griffiths, Richard Harris, Ian Hart, John Hurt, Alan Rickman, Fiona Shaw, Maggie Smith and Julie Walters.
Director: Chris Columbus
Genre: Family/Adventure

Synopsis:
Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) has learned to live with his bullying Uncle Vernon (Richard Griffiths), his callous Aunt Petunia (Fiona Shaw) and the constant whining of his greedy, spoiled cousin Dudley. He has even learned to live with sleeping in the cupboard under the stairs.

Harry's relatives have just reluctantly learned to live with the unwelcome presence of their orphaned relation, a constant reminder of Petunia's "wayward" sister and brother-in-law and their mysterious and untimely demise.

Even the impending arrival of his 11th birthday offers no excitement for Harry because as usual, there is little chance of receiving cards, presents or any kind of birthday treat. This year, however, is different.

Based on the first of J.K. Rowling's popular children's novels about Harry Potter, the live action family adventure film "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" tells us the story of a boy who learns on his 11th birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses unique magical powers of his own.

Invited to attend "Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry", Harry embarks on the adventure of a lifetime. At Hogwarts, he finds the home and family he has never had.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Derailed Movie Review


Derailed Movie Review,

Derailed Movie Review

Cast: Clive Owen, Jennifer Aniston, Vincent Cassel, Melissa George, RZA, Addison Timlin, Tom Conti, Xzibit, Giancarlo Esposito, David Morrissey, Rachel Blake, Georgina Chapman
Director: Mikael Håfström
Screenplay: Stuart Beattie (based on the novel by James Siegel)
Genre: Thriller
Rated: MA coarse language, strong violence
Running Time: 107 Minutes

They Never Saw It Coming

Synopsis:
Meeting on a commuter train one morning in Chicago, ad executive Charles (Owen) and financial analyst Lucinda (Aniston) have an immediate connection. Worn down by his job, strained marriage, and a sick child, Charles finds himself drawn to the escape Lucinda can offer. A lunch meeting, followed by dinner and drinks, leads the way to a rendezvous in a sleazy motel, where no sooner have the adulterous lovebirds ripped each other's clothes off than a sadistic thief (Vincent Cassel) breaks into the room and puts them through hours of nightmarish horror.

Because of their relationship's illicit nature, the two are unable to go to the cops, and are thus virtually powerless to their attacker's every whim, leaving themselves open to blackmail as he threatens their families and lives. Choosing momentary gratification and the excitement of the unknown over the values he generally holds dear, Charles more than pays the price for his indiscretion.

My Verdict:
Advertising executive Charles Schine (Clive Owen) is married and has a diabetic daughter whose health makes his life financially challenging. Seemingly bored with his lot, he befriends a woman, financial analyst Lucinda (Jennifer Aniston) on the commuter train and before long they are engaged in a romantic tryst at a dodgy motel. Just as Charles and Lucinda are about to consummate their relationship an intruder, Philippe LaRouche (Vincent Cassel) barges his way into their room, physically attacks Charles, rapes Lucinda and steals their wallets. Lucinda refuses to allow Charles to contact the police for fear of recriminations from her husband.

Pretending he was mugged to his colleagues and family, Charles is now at a crossroad in his life, and tries to make sense of what has happened. Pretty soon LaRouche is blackmailing Charles and he even has the audacity to enter Charles' home on the pretext of being a business associate. It is now up to Charles to put a stop to the relentless blackmailing and get back his life.

Clive Owen has an impressive portfolio of roles ('Closer' 2005, 'Sin City' 2005) and yet in 'Derailed' he has somehow taken on something that doesn't offer him the opportunity to really fire. He struggles valiantly to stop this train from running out of steam, let down by too many unbelievable coincidences that fall short of credibility. For a man whose only child is ill with life-threatening diabetes, his decision to hand over the family life-savings is seriously up for question. This is just one example of the many decisions Owen's character makes that just doesn't ring true and therefore disappoints.

Jennifer Aniston is barely passable as Lucinda with her character not being truly seductive enough or ruthless enough so she just tends to hover somewhere on safe ground, never being convincing. Vincent Cassel on the other hand is a master at playing the evil, conniving and wicked character and so fits in nicely. Hip-hop artist RZA plays Winston the postal deliveryman in Charles' office. He has a relationship with Charles that extends beyond a passing glance in the corridor but the problem here is to understand anything RZA says; the language, although it is English, sometimes sounds so foreign that it is distracting and even annoying.

With plenty of plot twists that were often obvious long before they occurred, 'Derailed' is a bit messy and sometimes even runs off the rails, which is a shame as there was the potential for this to be so much more. Supposedly a thriller is meant to be suspenseful and gripping, with a well-thought out plot and surprises around corners, but here the elusive bombshells are too far and few between leaving the viewer frustrated, much like the lead character Charles.



Christina Bruce

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Blood and Chocolate Review


Blood and Chocolate

Starring: Agnes Bruckner, Hugh Dancy, Olivier Martinez, Bryan Dick, Katja Riemann.
Director: Kalja von Garnier.

'Blood and Chocolate' stars Agnes Bruckner ('24'), Hugh Dancy ('Basic Instinct 2,') and Olivier Martinez ('Taking Lives') and is directed by German independent film

In Cinemas 26th January.
director Katja von Garnier ('Bandits'). The story takes place in modern day Bucharest and tells the tale of nineteen year old Vivian Gandillon (Bruckner), who has spent her life on the run from the truth.... that she is a werewolf. When her affections for a visiting American artist threaten to expose her family's secret society, she must choose between her love for an outsider and betraying the secret vows of her family.

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Casino Royale


Casino Royale (2006)
Also known as: Bond 21

Based on Ian Fleming’s first novel to feature the ultimate secret agent, which was published in 1953. The film traces the early career of James Bond. His first “007” mission leads him to Le Chiffre, banker to the world’s terrorists. In order to stop him and bring down the terrorist network, Bond must beat Le Chiffre in a high-stakes poker game at Casino Royale. Bond is initially annoyed when a beautiful Treasury official, Vesper Lynd, is assigned to deliver his stake for the game and watch over the government's money. But as Bond and Vesper survive a series of lethal attacks by Le Chiffre and his henchmen, a mutual attraction develops, leading them both into further danger and events that will shape Bond’s life forever.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Spiderman Review


Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Willem Dafoe, James Franco, J.K. Simmons.
Directed by: Sam Raimi.
Written by: David Koepp

Based on the legendary flagship character of Marvel comics, this is the story of Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire), a geeky high school student living with his Aunt May and Uncle Ben after the death of his parents when he was just a baby. He's an avid student with a much-less-than-stellar social life and a knack for bad luck. While attending a scientific demonstration, a freak accident bombards a stray spider with radiation, and that same spider finds its way onto the unsuspecting Peter's body and bites him, miraculously granting him incredible spider-like abilities; in effect, turning him into the amazing Spider-Man. Peter will find that there's a thin line between an ordinary man and an extraordinary hero; and he'll have to be the one to cross it as he does battle with the Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe) and tries to win the love of his next door neighbour Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst}.

It is rare that a much-hyped Hollywood blockbuster actually lives up to the hype, but here comes Spider-Man to change all that. Sam Raimi's visually inventive take on the Marvel comic character lives up to expectation and more, in this smart, sassy, funny and truly exciting adventure that is a far and away the best comic book movie to hit our screens since the first Superman films. Not falling into the traps set by Tim Burton with his dingy Batman, Spider-Man refuses to take itself too seriously, yet at the same time, remains faithful to Stan Lee and Steve Ditko's comic book creation. Director Raimi returns to familiar territory here, but clearly shows his imaginative cinematic style, bringing a depth of vision and wonderful sense of storytelling to the screen. Raimi and writer David Koepp have skilfully fleshed out the Parker character to imbue him with a vivid boyish humanity, a sense of ordinariness, that makes his gradual transformation into the heroic title character all the more fascinating, and Peter's journey, both genuinely bizarre and rather funny.

The casting for this is perfect. While it was hard to imagine Tobey Maguire as Spider-Man, having seen the film, it's equally hard to imagine the film without him. The 27-year old actor embodies Peter Parker's boyish nerdiness to a tee, initially creating the portrait of an insecure loner impassioned with science and desperately in love with his life-long next door neighbour, before discovering what his new-found alter-ego is capable of. Maguire is the perfect Spider-Man, and the more perfect Peter Parker; it's an astonishing, beautifully managed performance. Willem Dafoe is hypnotic as Parker's ultimate arch enemy, the Green Goblin, a character who successfully suggests that evil is personified by our deepest fears and anger. Dafoe is perfect and wonderful to watch. Nobody excels as playing the sweet teenage damsel in distress with as much fragility as the luminous Kirsten Dunst and James Franco is impressive as Parker's best friend Harry Osborn.

Stylishly directed by the wonderful Sam Raimi, he keeps his Spider-Man moving at a brisk pace, yet manages to ensure our empathy for the title character. There is also smartness to Raimi's Spider-Man that one wouldn't necessarily expect, but with its subtle references to contemporary pop culture and other super creations, there is much to look for beneath the surface. The special effects are not surprisingly, impressive, yet never detract from the narrative and a strong sense of character. The film is beautifully crafted and looks spectacular. Through it all, this Spider-Man is totally engaging from woe to go, a 2 hour fun-filled rollercoaster ride that never once insults the intelligence of its audience. As Peter Parker cleverly weaves his web, so does this enthralling film.

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

300 Review

300

Review: Zack Snyder creates a masterpiece with this fantastic adaptation of the Frank Miller graphic novel.

by Todd Gilchrist

It's truly difficult to resist making epic proclamations about a filmmaker's career after watching something like 300. Director Zack Snyder, the man responsible for a superlative remake of George Romero's Dawn of the Dead, adapts Frank Miller's graphic novel with passion and creativity, proving that classical storytelling will never go out of style — especially if more filmmakers are able to make it look as cool and exciting as this. Combining old-school mythmaking with ultramodern technique, Snyder has crafted a one-of-a-kind masterpiece that is unlike any movie audiences have seen, and in so doing he may have sealed his own fate as a possible redeemer of modern moviemaking.


Gerard Butler plays Leonidas, the wise king of Sparta. Raised with the utmost ideals — honor, duty, glory — Leonidas is a brilliant military strategist and egalitarian champion of personal freedom. So when news arrives from Persia to herald Xerxes' (Rodrigo Santoro) sovereignty over Sparta, he rebuffs the declaration and announces that his countrymen must fight to preserve their way of life. Unfortunately, the Spartan elders honor an ancient and fickle belief system that prohibits Leonidas from challenging the impending Persian hordes.

Fearing for the safety and freedom of his people, Leonidas enlists 300 soldiers -- declared his personal bodyguards -- and mounts a valiant defense against Xerxes and his limitless armies. Meanwhile, his wife, Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey), attempts to employ more diplomatic means to solicit support from the Spartan council, even as Theron (Dominic West) poisons its members to her plan from within.

The simplicity of the plot is the film's greatest virtue. Rather than languishing in the details of military strategy or inundating audiences in the subtleties of Spartan politics, director Snyder renders Miller's story in big, broad strokes. For example, the film's opening sequence introduces rather simply the cultural tradition that inspired larger-than-life figures like Leonidas: Great men are born and bred, nurtured in their natural abilities and trained to serve a specific purpose. Indeed, this sequence not only explains everything one needs to know about the hero, but reveals the origins of his masterful battle strategy… not to mention the Spartan philosophical ideals upon which it is based.


At the same time, however, there is a palpable humanity to Leonidas and his men. While they do in some way provide the latest cinematic iteration of Schwarzeneggeresque musclemen — not one of them is built less than Ford tough — they are not without thoughts and feelings, which are applied liberally to their efforts to protect one another and, by extension, their Spartan homeland.

Best of all, Leonidas' relationship with his wife Gorgo offers a rare display of tenderness and devotion that is seldom seen in "guy movies" like this one, and provides some of the film's most profound and lasting emotional underpinnings. Notwithstanding a sex scene that almost surely ranks as one of the hottest and most beautiful in recent memory, theirs is a partnership that reflects mutual understanding and shows the sort of commitment that is to be aspired to in real life as much as on the silver screen.

Thankfully, the acting also plays directly to this seeming juxtaposition between classicism and modernism. Butler, a reliable Russell Crowe-like leading man who hasn't yet enjoyed the success he deserves, finally finds his Maximus in Leonidas. He possesses enough strength and tenderness to satisfy all of the demands of his character, and yet defines the film within terms that will have audiences swooning over his personal stage presence for countless roles to come. As Gorgo, meanwhile, Headey is a terrific adult beauty who conveys credible intelligence as well as smoldering sexuality. The lack of self-consciousness she lends her character — especially when clothed — is far hotter than and sort of make-up for the "prettiness" filmmakers might have found in a more familiar (i.e. commercial) face.

Of course, the only way their performances would have worked is if the material was treated deadly serious, and Snyder exerts masterful control to make sure that each defiant turn and earnest proclamation is absolutely sincere. He choreographs the action in such a way as to inspire awe no matter what his characters are doing, employing slow-motion so freely that it seems more the norm than the 24 frames per second that audiences have become accustomed to. But at the same time, none of these flourishes feel superfluous. Instead, they create the kind of momentum and operatic scope that elevates a tall tale to the stuff of legend.


That said, there are so many painterly images in 300 that it qualifies as the closest thing to "pure cinema" that audiences have come to in quite some time: The silhouette of the Spartan elders' temple against a cloud-stained moon; the spectacle of dead bodies in the shape of a great, gnarled hand reaching out of scorched soil; more than one extended shot of the Spartans laying waste to their adversaries as the camera changes speeds, zooms and shifts focus to keep up; and the pristine and breathtaking shadow of a lone spear as it ascends a stairwell towards its designated target.

Ultimately, the film looks a little bit like a Boris Vallejo print come to life — muscled supermen springing to action to save their oil-painted landscape — and full credit must go to Snyder. But with both this and Dawn of the Dead, he has proven himself a consummate storyteller who can transform convention into cinematic magic… which is why it's with reluctant enthusiasm that we assign him the responsibility of restoring the luster of mainstream movies.

After all, who knows how well Snyder will do moving forward, or what career path he might follow? It seems like his only (or maybe most obvious) predecessor would be Ridley Scott, who broke into the mainstream with a similar sort of genre-movie deconstruction and whose last big commercial success no doubt served as at least a vague template for some of the style on display here. Suffice it to say that Snyder could do worse than follow Scott's career path, rewriting rules and changing the landscape with each new effort. But keep in mind that it took Scott 22 years to follow Alien with a Gladiator, and it took only four for Snyder to go from Dawn to 300.

Ultimately, this film combines an archetypal conflict, an ancient storytelling tradition reaching back as far as the Greeks themselves, and technique that makes it relevant to modern audiences. In other words, it's not clear whether great movie myths are born or bred, but 300 is unequivocally one of them.



Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Lord Of War Movie Review

Lord Of War Movie Review

Cast: Nicolas Cage, Jared Leto, Bridget Moynahan, Sir Ian Holm, Ethan Hawke
Director: Andrew Niccol
Screenplay: Andrew Niccol
Genre: Drama/Crime/Thriller
Rated: MA coarse language, strong drug use, strong violence
Running Time: 117 Minutes

He Sells Guns... And He's Making A Killing.

Synopsis:
'Lord Of War' is an action adventure story set in the world of international arms dealing.

The film, based on fact, follows the globetrotting exploits of arms dealer Yuri Orlov (Nicolas Cage). Through some of the deadliest war zones, Yuri struggles to stay one step ahead of a relentless Interpol agent (Ethan Hawke), his business rivals, even some of his customers who include many of the world's most notorious dictators.

Finally, Yuri must also face his own conscience

My Verdict:
Yuri Orlov (Nicolas Cage) was born in the Ukraine but settled with his parents and younger brother, Vitaly (Jared Leto) in Brooklyn in the 1970's. The disillusioned Yuri yearns for something bigger and better than working in his parent's humble restaurant and before long he is a fledgling arms dealer. With his brother sometimes along for the ride, Yuri soon progresses and learns the ropes in becoming a fully-fledged arms dealer, taking on all nations seemingly without conscience. He declares he is just a businessman and soon learns all the loopholes needed to pull off his pursuit, whilst dealing with the biggest and often most corrupt leaders of so many nations around the globe.

But Yuri's life takes turns he doesn't anticipate. His beloved brother Vitaly soon becomes a drug-addict, he pursues a beautiful model, Ava Cordova (Bridget Moynahan), marries her and they have a son, and he is constantly being pursued by an Interpol agent Jack Valentine (Ethan Hawke). Over time, Yuri's life will come to haunt him in ways he could never imagine with the threat of losing those he loves most.

Nicolas Cage narrates 'The Lord Of War' in his inimitable style of straightforward honesty and frankness and this is one of the strongest elements and most enjoyable of the movie (it also helps as he fills in the gaps along the way). Having the gift of being able to talk around any situation is what helps his character accomplish his goal and Cage gives a powerful and convincing performance. He has the physical stature to match his clients, and always appears confident even if he hides insecurity and fear.

Cage's character develops over the course of the movie and we see him evolve into someone who does have feelings and emotions that belie what he does for a living. It is this development that is satisfying, along with his ability to maintain the character, even though it plays out as an episodic history of Yuri's life rather than a continuing sequence.

Jared Leto as Vitaly, who struggles to deal with inability to accept Yuri and his life, gives strong support and in a small but pivotal role, Ian Holm proves yet again that sometimes less is more, as he can say so much with just a look. Ethan Hawke manages to portray the frustrated Jack Valentine with ease and never looks challenged, as does Bridget Moynahan as Yuri's wife.

'Lord Of War' is a giant can of worms that can be ignored or used to open the eyes to the real issue of arms-dealers and gunrunners as some of the events are based on true incidents and therefore may be distressing to some. The reality of the situation is thought provoking enough to linger after the credits roll. And yes, there are hundreds of guns, actually, make that thousands!

Backed by some classic rock songs, 'Lord Of War' is an eye-opening movie if nothing else. It is entertaining, insightful and sometimes violent yet not overtly sadistic or cruel and certainly shows Nicolas Cage at his best.

Rating : ***½

Christina Bruce

Friday, February 9, 2007

A Man Apart ( Review )


A Man Apart Review

Love changes a man. Revenge tears him apart.

  • Released: June 12 2003
  • Cast: Vin Diesel,
  • Director: F. Gary Gray, Larenz Tate, Timothy Olyphant, Jacqueline Obradors, Geno Silva
  • Genre: Action
  • Rated: MA 15+
  • Running Time: 109 Minutes
Synopsis:
A Man Apart features Vin Diesel in a compelling role as tough DEA agent Sean Vetter, who sets out to avenge the brutal murder of his wife in a botched hit. As the drug wars rage along the Mexican/US border, a major player from the Baja Cartel is imprisoned and a mysterious figure known as Diablo wrests control over the entire operation. Now, Vetter and his partner (Larenz Tate) must join forces with jailed cartel boss to hunt down this dangerous and elusive new player.


My Verdict:
A Man Apart is a real guy flick. There is plenty of heat, action and shooting with Vin Diesel torn apart by the death of his gorgeous wife. Revenge is high on his priority list after his wife dies in his arms and boy does he have the looks to convey that he will stop at nothing to avenge her death. Some may find his acting wooden, but with his looks he doesn't have much choice. He just oozes vengeance while the film revolves around this vengeance. The plot is a little thin around the edges - we all know he will win eventually - but it doesn't really matter. There are some slow scenes which are tedious, but then the action scenes make up for those with some truly wicked shoot- outs between the cops and the drug lords. It is amazing to see yet again our hero surviving these shoot-outs even without a bullet-proof vest. This is not a film that will set the industry on fire but rather another reason for those keen on cops and robber type movies to go and have some fun. Definitely not to be taken too seriously.

Thursday, February 1, 2007

A Beautiful Mind (Review)


A Beautiful Mind (Review)

"The only thing greater than the power of the mind is the courage of the heart."

Release Date: 7th March, 2002
Starring: Russell Crowe, Ed Harris, Jennifer Connelly, Adam Goldberg, Paul Bettany
Director: Ron Howard
Genre: Drama
Rated: TBA


Synopsis:
From the heights of notoriety to the depths of depravity, John Forbes Nash, Jr. experiences it all. A mathematical genius, he made an astonishing discovery early in his career and stood on the brink of international acclaim. But the handsome and arrogant Nash soon found himself on a painful and harrowing journey of self-discovery once he was diagnosed with schizophrenia. After many years of struggle, he eventually triumphed over this tragedy, and finally, late in life, received the Nobel Prize.

Monday, January 15, 2007

Hellboy ( Review )


Hellboy ( Review )

Cast: Ron Perlman, John Hurt, Rupert Evans, Selma Blair, Jeffrey Tambor, Doug Jones and the voice of David Hyde Pierce
Director: Guillermo del Toro
Writer: Guillermo del Toro and Peter Briggs
Genre: Action/Sci-fi/Horror/Adventure
Rated: M medium level violence
Running Time: 122 Minutes

Here To Protect

Synopsis:
From visionary writer/director Guillermo del Toro (Blade II, The Devil's Backbone) comes Hellboy, a supernatural action adventure based on Mike Mignola's popular Dark Horse Comics series of the same name. Born in the flames of hell and brought to Earth as an infant to perpetrate evil, Hellboy (Ron Perlman) was rescued from sinister forces by the benevolent Dr. Broom (John Hurt), who raised him to be a hero. In Dr. Broom's secret Bureau of Paranormal Research and Defence, Hellboy creates an unlikely family consisting of the telepathic "Mer-Man" Abe Sapien (Doug Jones) and Liz Sherman (Selma Blair), the woman he loves who can control fire. Hidden from the very society that they protect, they stand as the key line of defence against an evil madman who seeks to reclaim Hellboy to the dark side and use his powers to destroy mankind.

My Verdict:
The beginning of 'Hellboy' is one of those vague, confusing segments that are only there to provide the origin behind the main character. Very often this precursor is superfluous and here it definitely was. The origin of Hellboy may well have been explained without this introduction and saved us all much confusion - the recent 'Spiderman 2' got around this by introducing the character and story through the opening credits via a series of comic book drawings. Seeing Dr. Broom, who was to become Hellboy's father, discover the baby Hellboy was laughable and not a good sign for things to come. However, the movie did manage to turn itself around and provide some great entertainment.

'Hellboy' is a comic book adaptation which is very popular (think X-Men, Spiderman, Conan the Barbarian, etc.) and akin to many of the comic book genre where, apart from the main character, there are other characters that have some form of 'special' qualities. Here there are a few and they are all used well - especially Kroenen (Ladislav Beran) who is discovered to have an addiction to surgery, even resorting to having his eyelids removed - yuk! These characters all provide excellent opportunities for some great computer generated image work and associated special effects and make-up.

Ron Perlman is perfect for the role of Hellboy and was the original choice of director Guillermo del Toro, having already worked with Ron in Blade II. Hellboy has a dark sense of humour and delivers some clever lines in a deadpan voice, so he is not without some endearing personality but he struggles with his identity on a daily basis, constantly reducing his horns to stumps and pining for the woman he loves - Liz Sherman (a forlorn Selma Blair) - but thinks he can't have because of his looks. He continues his work against evil for the sake of his father, Dr. Broom, played by an aged John Hurt. Dr. Broom has a new assistant assigned to Hellboy, John Myers (Rupert Evans) who adds a kind of love triangle angle to the already disillusioned Hellboy and Liz. Nevertheless, they head off to finally destroy the evil that created him, which is really another excuse for some more fun and games with special effects and they really are fun.

'Hellboy' is essentially a movie for anyone who loves a comic book adaptation with plenty of action and lots of special effects. Certainly a good-looking B-grade movie that might not be for everyone, but for the diehard fans, this Hellboy manages to give evil hell.

Rating : B-

Christina Bruce

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Alien Vs Predator ( Review )


Cast: Sanaa Lathan, Raoul Bova, Lance Henriksen, Ewen Bremner, Colin Salmon, and Tommy Flanagan.
Director: Paul W. S. Anderson
Writer: Paul W. S. Anderson (screenplay)
Genre: Science Fiction
Rated: M medium level violence, low level coarse language
Running Time: 101 Minutes

Whoever Wins, We Lose.

Synopsis:
The iconic monsters from two of the scariest film franchises ever battle each other on Earth in 'Alien Vs. Predator'. The discovery of an ancient pyramid buried under the Antarctic ice sends a team of scientists and adventurers to the frozen continent. There, they make an even more terrifying discovery: two alien races at war. No matter who wins, we lose.

An incredible and horrific adventure begins when billionaire industrialist Charles Bishop Weyland gathers an international team of archaeologists, scientists and security experts, led by environmentalist and adventurer Alexa "Lex" Woods, to investigate a mysterious "heat bloom" emanating from deep under Antarctica.

What they witness 2000 feet below the frozen surface at first excites, and then terrifies them. They discover a pyramid bearing a mixture of Aztec, Egyptian and Cambodian cultures. Inside the pyramid they find a matrix of chambers so technologically advanced that it becomes obvious that an extraterrestrial influence has been at work there for thousands of years. The chamber walls reconfigure unexpectedly, trapping members of the team and cutting them off from their colleagues.

Moving from chamber to chamber, the horrific truth finally reveals itself: Predators have been keeping alive a captive Alien Queen who lays eggs at 100 year intervals. Young Predator warriors are tested by fighting the Alien offspring. The team stumbles into the middle of an incredible rite of passage - and a war between Aliens and Predators.

My Verdict:
'Alien Vs Predator' has been an anticipated movie for so long. Two of the most destructive, vicious evil alien characters created for the screen pitted against one another, a bit like waiting for 'Freddy v Jason'. The movie doesn't introduce either character for a while, slowly building the anticipation as the scientific party discovers an ancient pyramid beneath the Antarctic. This pyramid is interesting as the scientific party soon discover that it reconfigures itself every 10 minutes and reeks of 'Indiana Jones', which increases the level of expectation. Trouble is, the party is soon split into groups and then you know that one by one they are going to be killed off with no hope of saving each other. Enter the Alien and Predator to do just that.

After reducing the human numbers significantly, much of the action where the Predator takes on the Alien(s) is basically in the dark which allows for plenty of 'funny business' - who knows what's really happening, coupled with some very choppy editing making some of the battle scenes a total blur. And then before you know it, the movie is over! There is little human character development; unlike in either of the single franchises, so much of the movie seems pointless. But still, there might be enough to satisfy some fans of the genre but this will never be a great movie.

You know those movies where the best parts are often in the trailer? Count this as one of those. Unfortunately this movie could have been so much better if we weren't let in on some of the secrets in the trailer. A long build up at the start sets a snare for a finale that never really satisfies which was so disappointing. I just wished that these two protagonists had been left alone and their memories kept alive as individual anti-heroes.

Rating : C-

Christina Bruce